Oh, let’s be regionable!

The regions. Are you excited?

When I first moved to the Eastern Townships, I was thrilled to learn that there was a CBC Radio network dedicated to serving the English community outside Montreal. It wasn’t long after this that I learned that CBC referred to all these non-Montreal places as “the regions.”

I imagined this scenario:

“You mustn’t go, Jean-Louis, you mustn’t!”

“I’m sorry, Marie-Framboise, but the regions call to me. Their barren, vaguely described spaces, the noble savagery of their slow-moving farm machinery, the haunting homogeneity of the natives’ overall whiteness.”

Mais Jean-Louis, you must surely know that, in the regions, you may never again find… a decent bagel.”

“It’s the risk I must take, ma petite crevette, for go I must, to broadcast live from Townshippers’ Day.”

“The regions” sounds like a place where people and careers go to die. It’s a phrase said in a somber, defeated tone, like “The Troubles” or “The Canadiens.”

It’s a flat, grey term that does a disservice to the diversity of Quebec’s non-urban communities. It patronizingly transforms Quebec into Montreal and Everywhere Else, the City and Unimportant Places, the Centre of the Universe and That Place With All The Parking.

(I solicited comments online about this term, and a number of people suggested that Quebec City and Gatineau aren’t considered part of the regions. But I bet if you asked someone from Montreal, then, yeah, come on, they’re in the regions… As for Sherbrooke, totally region.)

I thought this was just a CBC thing, but I suspect it probably goes back to the division of Quebec into 20 administrative regions, which is not something you’re going to see on a tourism brochure anytime soon: “Come for the Administrative Region, Stay for the Contract Bid Submissions!”

I’ve also seen the term a couple of times during the current provincial election campaign. The front page of Monday’s Montreal Gazette, for instance, reported that the CAQ’s “Legault heads to regions.” This is a somewhat dismissive term to describe his campaign trip to Val d’Or and on to Chibougamau. The correct term to describe these places is, of course, “really friggin’ far.”

Earlier this month, PQ leader Jean-François Lisée floated a proposition that English cegep students should spend their final semester at a French cegep, “preferably in the regions” (en région). First of all, Lisée seems unaware that English cegeps like Champlain College already exist in “the regions” (typical regionalist!). How are those English students already in the regions supposed to go off and study French in the regions? Somewhere even regioner? Is there an area of Quebec that’s the regionest of them all? (Yes: Piopolis.)

As I was carping about this online, one of my CBC acquaintances chimed in, saying “regions” was at least better than “off-island.” She then challenged me to come up with an alternative term.

So what are we to call these so-called regions? They have many of the same services, options and cultural offerings as the city, only perhaps in less quantity. Thus you have “the metropolis,” and then you have “the metropoless.”

(A variation also works in French: There is “le métropole”; and then there is the place without a subway, “le métro-pas.”)

Other options:

  • Pays de Potluck
  • Frontières Sans Médicins
  • Last-Gaspésie
  • Chainsaw Country
  • The Outlands (which would make its residents Outlandish)
  • Les Zones Vertes
  • Les Zones Fosse Septique
  • Chez Ross

At very least we should not be lumping all of rural and semi-rural Quebec under a single catch-all term. We should have the Eastern Regions and the Western Regions, the Upper Regions and, naturally, the Nether Regions. (Thank you, Andrew Greenfield, for this suggestion.)

I challenge you, readers, to come up with a solution. And fast, for now that we have let this cat out of the bag (laisser le chat échappé le sac), I fear the government will step in with an official toponymie, and we will become known as les territoires sous-urbaines multifonctionnelles de la paysage, or TSUMPs – which is what you get when the city folks come out here to the regions and cut down all the RTEEs.


Note to my non-Quebec readers: I considered hyperlinking much of this content so you could understand the terms and context, but you kind of have to be here. 

About rossmurray1

I'm Canadian so I pronounce it "Aboot." No, I don't! I don't know any Canadian who says "aboot." Damnable lies! But I do know this Canadian is all about humour (with a U) and satire. Come by. I don't bite, or as we Canadians say, "beet."
This entry was posted in Canada and/or Quebec, It Really Did Happen! and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to Oh, let’s be regionable!

  1. I’m an Ausländer and cannot vote, but you’ve got a terrific list there, Frontières Sans Médicin& Last-Gaspésie have me laughing out loud.   And definitely “Nether Regions.”
    There’s a decent police show (British) called “Hinterland,” which is a German term of course, and that’s my preferred term for my part of Upstate NY – “land in back of” (and not “hind parts, vaguely suggestive of cows”). Google translator renders it as “arrière-pays.” I’m kind of astonished no PR or Chamber of Commerce hasn’t leaped unto the breach with “branding conceptualizations” – NY has The Catskills, The Finger Lakes Region, The Leatherstocking Region, etc. and now every neighborhood in Geneva has official twee signposts “Historic North,” “Western Gardens,” “Castle Heights.”
    From the New York State Guide for Boaters: “…after leaving the Seaway, and passing Trois-Rivières, you’re passing “The Regions.” Moorings are available at the boondocks. The locals are provincial but friendly for the most part…“

  2. Until a few years ago, I lived just across the St. Mary’s River, in Sault Sainte Marie, MI. We also had access to CBC Radio, there, and I loved it:) Would that have them a part of “the regions” too? All kidding aside, I still miss CBC and rarely listen to the radio, these days. Guess that I should give NPR another chance…

  3. List of X says:

    You better hope that the powers that be don’t recognize that the regions have some urban areas and don’t name you “les territoires rural et urbaines multifonctionnelles de la paysage”, or TRUMPs.

  4. Pierre Rastoul says:

    Otherlands… Outsiders… Peripherics… Farfetched areas… Shithole areas ( ! )… Extravagants… Nowhere Lands… Out-of-sighters.. Yonderlings… LostAnglia (oops !)… Weirdouts… Wanderlosts…

    Or in French: Les Étranges… Zones Écartées… ORNIs (objets ruraux non-identifiés)… Points-de-non-retour… Zones Sous-développées… Arrière-pays arriérés… Milieu-de-nulle-part… Banlieusards…

  5. Calgary thinks that Edmonton is a region, so this problem is everywhere. But then again …

  6. It’s just a word. In New York they’re boroughs. Back home, Cleveland was divided into East Side and West Side. As you drive, you don’t see dotted lines in the road so why be fussy?

    I was listening to Howard Stern yesterday and a female caller from Montreal said that the city was chock-a-block with stunningly beautiful women but the biggest collection of homely men on the planet. Can you imagine?!

  7. ksbeth says:

    at least the TSUMPs, are a step up from the TRUMPs that we are currently forced to deal with.

  8. cat9984 says:

    Perhaps they could refer to you by your numbers, like the Paris suburbs. The province thinks it’s part of France.

Go ahead, don't be shy.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.